dontcareaboutGC
03-24 08:14 AM
yes that is correct-
wallpaper 2011 california gold rush,
immi2006
05-25 12:49 AM
Bill Clinton was in Cisco Campus last week in connection with some strategic meeting for Cisco, which they have it yearly at Monterey, CA. Clinton has made it clear to its employees, they come first in line in respect to immigration/Green Cards. Rest follow. So it may be a good idea if followed up with Bill. He supports Tech Industry. Apparently, employees have access to this info via Video On Demand internally.
Bill Clinton was a special invitee at Cisco. Would it be a good idea to connect with Clinton to seek support ? Perhaps too late ? Vinod Khosla and Bill are extremely close.
Bill Clinton was a special invitee at Cisco. Would it be a good idea to connect with Clinton to seek support ? Perhaps too late ? Vinod Khosla and Bill are extremely close.
monkeyfresh
11-14 05:28 PM
I am available to work on a freelance basis, and very enthusiastic about creating interesting and unique Flash based projects. I have extensive experience in working in a freelance environment as I've been making my living as a freelance Flash developer for two years.
Please feel free to visit my web site to attain a thorough understanding of my capabilities.
dubko productions (http://www.dubko.com)
Thank you
Please feel free to visit my web site to attain a thorough understanding of my capabilities.
dubko productions (http://www.dubko.com)
Thank you
2011 Aussie Gold Rush: australia,
ItIsNotFunny
05-08 12:57 PM
visa bulletin is already out
EB2 India - 01JAN00
Multiple threads are already out!
Good morning :)
EB2 India - 01JAN00
Multiple threads are already out!
Good morning :)
more...
emilytai
06-26 01:03 PM
Dear All:
I-140 approval 6/25/08
I-485 approval 6/26/08
EB-2 Concurrent filing
I-140 Sent 07/30/07
I-140 Notice 09/18/07
Title: Accountant
But I just submit I-765 (EAD) renew by 6/22/08. Now I found out my I-140 and I-485 are all approved. Can I revoke or withdraw I-765(EAD) from USCIS?
Do anyone have similar case?
Sincerely,
Emily
I-140 approval 6/25/08
I-485 approval 6/26/08
EB-2 Concurrent filing
I-140 Sent 07/30/07
I-140 Notice 09/18/07
Title: Accountant
But I just submit I-765 (EAD) renew by 6/22/08. Now I found out my I-140 and I-485 are all approved. Can I revoke or withdraw I-765(EAD) from USCIS?
Do anyone have similar case?
Sincerely,
Emily
Macaca
07-07 08:36 AM
Bush Struggles With Pelosi and Reid (http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/B/BUSH_PELOSI_REID?SITE=AZTUC&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT) By BEN FELLER Associated Press Writer, Jul 7
Ben Feller covers the White House for The Associated Press.
WASHINGTON (AP) -- When President Bush invited lawmakers for a picnic, an approaching storm threatened to derail the event. His spokesman, Tony Snow, suggested that Democratic leaders in Congress secretly wanted it that way.
"They've been seeding the clouds," he said.
A little joke, a little suspicion. It seemed appropriate for Bush's relationship with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.
In public, there are promises to work together, then unmistakable acrimony. Private dealings are respectful, but not fully trustful.
Where ill will seeps out between Bush and the two Democratic leaders, it is not based on personal animus, those close to them say. Rather, it is rooted in vastly different views of how to run the country, and how much say each side has in running it.
Pelosi and Reid say Bush blithely dismisses their roles as leaders of a coequal branch of government; Bush says they overreach and meddle, never more so than in the case of the war in Iraq.
How well they get along, a fascination in Washington, is important in a much broader sense: It affects what they get done for the country.
On that front, progress has been slow during the first half-year of this divided government.
Bush and Democratic leaders agreed on new trade-policy guidelines, but Congress later refused to renew his fast-track trade power. Bush vetoed the Democrats' bid to expand stem cell research, a move that Reid and Pelosi called deplorable.
The president's immigration overhaul is dead. A potential energy agreement looks shaky at best. Bush is also in a worsening standoff with Congress over the firing of U.S. attorneys, and a huge fight is brewing over the main spending bills that keep the government in operation.
And, of course, there's the war.
"It's hard to know how they would get along without Iraq," said Charles Jones, who studies relations between Congress and the president as a nonresident senior fellow for The Brookings Institution.
"There are some issues on which they would probably work pretty effectively together, but the overlay of Iraq and the intense conflicts spills over," Jones said. "It makes it difficult for them just to say, 'Well, let's forget Iraq and work nicely on other issues.'"
The White House disputes that spillover, citing quiet negotiations taking place to renew Bush's education law and work with Democrats on the immigration legislation. The immigration bill died when conservatives in Bush's own party rebelled against it.
Iraq may be the better test case of Bush's relationship with Reid and Pelosi.
It took more than three months for Bush and Congress to agree on a war funding bill, gobbling up valuable and finite legislative time.
Bush vetoed the Democrats' first try because it included a timeline for U.S. troop withdrawal. Then came a grim meeting in which Bush, Pelosi and Reid chose negotiators but got little else done.
In the days that followed, Pelosi miffed the White House by holding a vote to pay for the war in stages, drawing another veto threat. Another negotiation session broke down.
Ultimately, hemmed in by time, both sides had to give or risk the political catastrophe of leaving combat troops unfunded.
So Democrats gave up the timeline for withdrawal. Bush agreed to add domestic spending to the bill and establish benchmarks for measuring progress in Iraq.
"The vote showed what's possible when we work together," the president said.
The reality is that the compromise was forced upon them all, because no one wanted to cut off money for the troops.
Still, quietly, some trust built through the experience. Bush's chief of staff, Josh Bolten, appreciated that Reid kept his word during negotiations; Reid respected that no details leaked from those private talks. He now says that Bush is listening more, but only compared with zero cooperation in prior years.
Bush's tendency has never been to engage Congress, said James Thurber, director of the Center for Congressional and Presidential Studies at American University.
"He doesn't have a close relationship with either one of them," Thurber said, referring to Pelosi and Reid. "I think that makes a difference. I don't see any evidence that he has come around to engaging the opposition party the way (Bill) Clinton did."
Bush, Reid and Pelosi all dismiss the idea that they don't like one another despite the constant public harping.
When the cameras are off, the tone is different, said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky, who has sat with Reid and Pelosi in private sessions with Bush.
"It's not an acrimonious kind of thing," McConnell said. "In all the meetings I've been in, there's never been a lack of courtesy. I don't think there's anything personal. We are just in different places. Everybody fully understands that we have different agendas."
Ben Feller covers the White House for The Associated Press.
WASHINGTON (AP) -- When President Bush invited lawmakers for a picnic, an approaching storm threatened to derail the event. His spokesman, Tony Snow, suggested that Democratic leaders in Congress secretly wanted it that way.
"They've been seeding the clouds," he said.
A little joke, a little suspicion. It seemed appropriate for Bush's relationship with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.
In public, there are promises to work together, then unmistakable acrimony. Private dealings are respectful, but not fully trustful.
Where ill will seeps out between Bush and the two Democratic leaders, it is not based on personal animus, those close to them say. Rather, it is rooted in vastly different views of how to run the country, and how much say each side has in running it.
Pelosi and Reid say Bush blithely dismisses their roles as leaders of a coequal branch of government; Bush says they overreach and meddle, never more so than in the case of the war in Iraq.
How well they get along, a fascination in Washington, is important in a much broader sense: It affects what they get done for the country.
On that front, progress has been slow during the first half-year of this divided government.
Bush and Democratic leaders agreed on new trade-policy guidelines, but Congress later refused to renew his fast-track trade power. Bush vetoed the Democrats' bid to expand stem cell research, a move that Reid and Pelosi called deplorable.
The president's immigration overhaul is dead. A potential energy agreement looks shaky at best. Bush is also in a worsening standoff with Congress over the firing of U.S. attorneys, and a huge fight is brewing over the main spending bills that keep the government in operation.
And, of course, there's the war.
"It's hard to know how they would get along without Iraq," said Charles Jones, who studies relations between Congress and the president as a nonresident senior fellow for The Brookings Institution.
"There are some issues on which they would probably work pretty effectively together, but the overlay of Iraq and the intense conflicts spills over," Jones said. "It makes it difficult for them just to say, 'Well, let's forget Iraq and work nicely on other issues.'"
The White House disputes that spillover, citing quiet negotiations taking place to renew Bush's education law and work with Democrats on the immigration legislation. The immigration bill died when conservatives in Bush's own party rebelled against it.
Iraq may be the better test case of Bush's relationship with Reid and Pelosi.
It took more than three months for Bush and Congress to agree on a war funding bill, gobbling up valuable and finite legislative time.
Bush vetoed the Democrats' first try because it included a timeline for U.S. troop withdrawal. Then came a grim meeting in which Bush, Pelosi and Reid chose negotiators but got little else done.
In the days that followed, Pelosi miffed the White House by holding a vote to pay for the war in stages, drawing another veto threat. Another negotiation session broke down.
Ultimately, hemmed in by time, both sides had to give or risk the political catastrophe of leaving combat troops unfunded.
So Democrats gave up the timeline for withdrawal. Bush agreed to add domestic spending to the bill and establish benchmarks for measuring progress in Iraq.
"The vote showed what's possible when we work together," the president said.
The reality is that the compromise was forced upon them all, because no one wanted to cut off money for the troops.
Still, quietly, some trust built through the experience. Bush's chief of staff, Josh Bolten, appreciated that Reid kept his word during negotiations; Reid respected that no details leaked from those private talks. He now says that Bush is listening more, but only compared with zero cooperation in prior years.
Bush's tendency has never been to engage Congress, said James Thurber, director of the Center for Congressional and Presidential Studies at American University.
"He doesn't have a close relationship with either one of them," Thurber said, referring to Pelosi and Reid. "I think that makes a difference. I don't see any evidence that he has come around to engaging the opposition party the way (Bill) Clinton did."
Bush, Reid and Pelosi all dismiss the idea that they don't like one another despite the constant public harping.
When the cameras are off, the tone is different, said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky, who has sat with Reid and Pelosi in private sessions with Bush.
"It's not an acrimonious kind of thing," McConnell said. "In all the meetings I've been in, there's never been a lack of courtesy. I don't think there's anything personal. We are just in different places. Everybody fully understands that we have different agendas."
more...
reddymjm
09-07 06:36 PM
I am predicting EB3 move to June 2002 by end of Sep 2011
1st Qtr: 3/1/2010
2nd Qtr:4/9/2010
3rd Qtr: 5/6/2010
4th Qtr: 6/1/2010
Correct the year. HEre is mine in this fun game.
1st Qtr: 3/1/2002
2nd Qtr:4/9/2002
3rd Qtr: 5/6/2002
4th Qtr: 6/1/2003.
Dont ask me HOW? Wait and see..:D
1st Qtr: 3/1/2010
2nd Qtr:4/9/2010
3rd Qtr: 5/6/2010
4th Qtr: 6/1/2010
Correct the year. HEre is mine in this fun game.
1st Qtr: 3/1/2002
2nd Qtr:4/9/2002
3rd Qtr: 5/6/2002
4th Qtr: 6/1/2003.
Dont ask me HOW? Wait and see..:D
2010 Australian Gold Rush
voldemar
06-25 05:31 PM
Does someone can throw light at:
Can I track EAD online ? And which address is EAD delivered at (Lawyers or Home address)?
Thanks
Yes, you can track EAD online. All you need is case number. EAD will come to applicant address.
Can I track EAD online ? And which address is EAD delivered at (Lawyers or Home address)?
Thanks
Yes, you can track EAD online. All you need is case number. EAD will come to applicant address.
more...
Dhundhun
05-10 07:26 PM
For how many years does the employer have to guarantee that it has funding to pay my salary? Or how does this thing work out. My employer has 300+ employees.
Any other requirements from the employer?
thanks
The employer has to be big enough (300+ is a big company) or if small (such as less than 15), it has to show company's return and sometimes business in hand.
Any other requirements from the employer?
thanks
The employer has to be big enough (300+ is a big company) or if small (such as less than 15), it has to show company's return and sometimes business in hand.
hair during the gold rush.
jcrajput
05-25 03:46 PM
anyone please?
more...
ranand00
07-10 10:57 PM
please if any suggestions on my previous post
i would really appreciate it
thanks
anand
i would really appreciate it
thanks
anand
hot the Australian Gold Rush
Blog Feeds
08-07 09:40 AM
Those of you who have been reading this blog awhile will recall the many posts I've written regarding major problems in the system of detention for immigrants facing potential deportation. Nina Bernstein of the New York Times reports this morning that the White House will enact a series of reforms designed to curb abuses. Some of the promised changes are vague, but an immediate step will be an end to sending families to the Hutto detention facility in Texas, a location that has been the source of many complaints.The Administration is apparently looking at more alternatives to detention for non-violent...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/08/obama-administration-announces-plans-to-reform-ice-detention-system.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/08/obama-administration-announces-plans-to-reform-ice-detention-system.html)
more...
house After the gold rush died down
nogc_noproblem
08-16 10:01 AM
Labor, I140 approved and I-485 filed during July-07. Have EAD and AP but never used it. Still on H1B, extended for 3 years based on approved I140 and valid until Dec 2011. With my GC employer all along, employer is applying for LCA now as my new client is located in different state. My questions are:
� Whether there will be any impact on my ongoing GC process if the job description on this new LCA is different?
� If anything goes wrong with this LCA, whether there will be any impact on my existing H1 and eventually on GC process?
� If something wrong happens to my H1, can I still switch to EAD after that?
� What is the process to move from H1B to EAD within the same company, is filing new I-9 with EAD detail is suffice?
Thanks
� Whether there will be any impact on my ongoing GC process if the job description on this new LCA is different?
� If anything goes wrong with this LCA, whether there will be any impact on my existing H1 and eventually on GC process?
� If something wrong happens to my H1, can I still switch to EAD after that?
� What is the process to move from H1B to EAD within the same company, is filing new I-9 with EAD detail is suffice?
Thanks
tattoo during the gold rush.
Blog Feeds
08-03 12:50 PM
Opponents of health care reform efforts have accused the President and Democrats in Congress of including millions of illegally present immigrants in proposals to expand health insurance coverage. Whether one thinks that including such individuals is good or bad, the fact is that only lawfully present immigrants will be eligible for inclusion in the various proposals being considered in Congress. Think Progress explains in a piece refuting erroneous reporting on Lou Dobbs show (surprised?). When you hear figures like 97% of people will be covered under the broadest plans, the 3% they're talking about leaving out are undocumented immigrants.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/08/antis-peddling-myth-that-illegally-present-immigrants-will-be-included-in-health-care-plan.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/08/antis-peddling-myth-that-illegally-present-immigrants-will-be-included-in-health-care-plan.html)
more...
pictures australian gold nugget
arizqi
08-26 09:44 AM
Hi
I recently graduated and got a job. I am currently working on OPT and the application for my H1 has been filed. I am looking at applying to some graduate schools for their online programs for working professionals. If I apply for these programs right now will my OPT be void?If my F1 changes to an H1 in October will I still be able to apply for the program without any issues?
Thank you for your help.
I recently graduated and got a job. I am currently working on OPT and the application for my H1 has been filed. I am looking at applying to some graduate schools for their online programs for working professionals. If I apply for these programs right now will my OPT be void?If my F1 changes to an H1 in October will I still be able to apply for the program without any issues?
Thank you for your help.
dresses for Australia in the 1850s
xtronics
03-08 02:16 PM
My H1 with Employer A expires Dec 2009 (7th yr). By that time, if my I140 gets approved (with Employer A) I will be eligible for 3 year extensions from there on. Employer A is willing to keep the I-140 current even if I leave them. Now my question is,
* If I change to Employer B's H1 prior to I-140 approval with employer A, am I eligible to apply for 3 yr extension when I am with Employer B?
Can I transfer from Employer B back to Employer A (if my priority date for I-485 becomes current) when I am on the 3yr extension?
The reason I ask is, if my Priority date becomes current and apply for the I-485, I do not want to use my EAD card. I want to be on H1 to be on safe side (incase anything happens to I-485)
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks
* If I change to Employer B's H1 prior to I-140 approval with employer A, am I eligible to apply for 3 yr extension when I am with Employer B?
Can I transfer from Employer B back to Employer A (if my priority date for I-485 becomes current) when I am on the 3yr extension?
The reason I ask is, if my Priority date becomes current and apply for the I-485, I do not want to use my EAD card. I want to be on H1 to be on safe side (incase anything happens to I-485)
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks
more...
makeup gold rush australia
Brad56
08-04 02:10 AM
I have bachelors degree in law and 7 years human resource training development manager. Could I apply for eb2?
girlfriend Australian Gold Rush | Gold
radhak
04-26 04:18 PM
You can check case processing times here..
Welcome to the iCERT Portal (http://icert.doleta.gov/)
Welcome to the iCERT Portal (http://icert.doleta.gov/)
hairstyles The Australian gold rush of
copsmart
06-07 10:17 PM
Here are my details.....
Paper filed: 05-19-2010
Received date: 05-20-2010
Notice date:06-01-2010
No updates yet.
Paper filed: 05-19-2010
Received date: 05-20-2010
Notice date:06-01-2010
No updates yet.
hyderabad123
06-22 06:01 PM
I applied GC labor in Mar 2005 and After 140 approval and 485 is pending morethan 2yrs, i changed my employer by using AC21. After that i recieved a letter from USCIS saying that I-485 denial on May 25th 2010, then after we applied on MTR on June 10th 2010. I recieved an reciept on June 20th 2010.
Can i work now by using an EAD or i need to wait until get the approval on MTR please do advice and when i could get the response from USCIS. My EAd is going to be expire within a couple of months, i applied renewal and i got a reciept on I-765. Please help me on this, really appreciate your help.
Can i work now by using an EAD or i need to wait until get the approval on MTR please do advice and when i could get the response from USCIS. My EAd is going to be expire within a couple of months, i applied renewal and i got a reciept on I-765. Please help me on this, really appreciate your help.
cbpds
07-11 12:39 AM
Its better to carry all docs incl I129
-CR.jpg "lady gaga born this way album")
